Musing
AI in art is a contentious subject.
Does art require human inspiration or can AI reasonably be expected to produce quality pieces to rival human artists?
Certainly AI can produce some art which is indistinguishable from human efforts. AI art isn't inspired.
Do we need to understand the artists motivation, thoughts or inspiration to appreciate art?
Often the answer is yes, artworks are considered good because of the message they are designed to communicate: highlighting injustice, portraying emotions, recording history, showcasing beauty etc.
AI can only do this incidently.
What about art which doesn't have a higher purpose, a flower, a landscape, a portrait?
AI can do this very well.
If you cannot tell if an artist is human or AI, is there any difference?
Probably not. You don't need a back story to like art.
AI animates art
I think AI bringing art works to life is wonderful.
Various tools which create videos from a users specification providing amazing results are already available. Sora and invideo allow you to create videos based on ideas you specify, there are some stunning videos produced by them.
Invideo in particular seems to be able to "bring artworks to life".
However, as I look there don't actually seem to be many examples out there. I expect it is actually very difficult to get them to produce something good with a "wow" factor to be worth sharing widely.
Examples
Examples are generally shared on TikTok, Insta, Facebook or Youtube. There are often many different copies floating around in different media. I have included some from Youtube, as it is easiest for me to provide links.
No comments:
Post a Comment